Sunday, December 31, 2006
Yet in his interactions with his patients, he exudes confidence, charm and reassurance.
This is a conscious decision. This is an aspect of the mask.
This is, in essence, utilizing the Placebo Effect to help his patients.
Dr Dork does not think he is being misleading or deceptive. He gives bad news truthfully, but with some dorky aplomb, he hopes. He ensures his patients are aware of potential pitfalls of treatment options. If he thinks a particular medication might help a particular patient, for example, he uses words such as "could" and "might" as opposed to "will". He gives probability outcomes where there is good evidence for such.
But Dr Dork knows that his subtle, subvocal clues, his body's unspoken language, his demeanour and so forth...have themselves a potentially significant contribution to the healing process. Especially in regards to symptoms of pain, depression, nausea and other scenarios where there can sometimes be a large psychological element contributing.
As strange as it may feel in the hands of a Dork...like any tool at his disposal to help his patients, it is sharpened, oiled, and used to best effect.
Saturday, December 30, 2006
Friday, December 29, 2006
There have been pushes in various Australian states for such "telephone triage" services. At the very best, they are staffed by nurses. Often, by persons with little clinical background in any discipline.
This is very, very dangerous territory.
Any doctor or nurse of reasonable experience knows well that medicine is art, as well as science. That clinical judgement and acumen are acquired through experience. That, sometimes, one can tell that something is just not right at a glance, without being able to put our finger on any objective criterion on which to pinpoint our suspicion...that something is subtly awry.
Dr Dork feels uncomfortable providing telephone advice to a patient he has not seen, and cannot see. He feels this is Bad Medicine.
These "health hotlines" are about bureaucratic cost cutting. A layer of insulation to shield ambulance services and emergency departments. As Dr Crippen and others have discussed in regards to NHS Direct in the UK.
Dr Dork does not know the specifics of what actually occurred in the Queensland case. This is pending on autopsy results.
Dr Dork knows well, however, that an ill wind bodes no good.
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
Tuesday, December 26, 2006
"And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me."
"The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons."
"The moral test of a government is how it treats those who are at the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the aged; and those who are in the shadow of life, the sick and the needy, and the handicapped."
Dr Dork notes a quintessential contrast in what he perceives of the
The NHS is disparaged as “socialised medicine”, as if that is a failing unto itself. Of course, private companies driven by shareholder profits would not exactly be more compassionate, one thinks, in attempting to distribute a limited resource unable to keep pace with demand.
This system is inherently possessed of two tiers of care level – in many areas, but not all. The public system struggles to meet demand in many areas. Emergency departments get overcrowded. Waiting lists for elective surgery are sometimes ridiculously long, and numbers are politically obfuscated. Only in the private system can you choose your doctor, choose your hospital, and not spend several months on firstly a waiting to be seen list, then a waiting to be treated list.
However, for acute, devastating injuries and illnesses, public hospitals are, arguably, much better equipped. Larger and better staffed ICUs, for example. Medium level staff always onsite.
One important annotation to the ‘private’ system is that health insurers in Oz are not-for-profit. There is no CEO earning $30 million in bonuses. There are no shareholders demanding cuts in coverage to boost their stock portfolio.
As mentioned in his previous post, Dr Dork is cogitating out loud on the two-tiered system in which he operates. This is further groundwork.
There is more to the story than this précis. Arguments for and against each approach. Dr Dork would love to hear from others experienced in multiple healthcare systems, as health provider or patient.
To echo the sentiments of Dr Crippen, in large part, Dr Dork is open in his bias: he believes healthcare is a right, and not a privilege, in any civilised society. Tax-based support of the public system in Oz is positively biased to place costs moreso on the wealthy who do not self-insure than the poor (the Medicare Levy).
It becomes, one could say, essentially an argument of efficiency and management, of finite resources confronted with ballooning demand, as our knowledge of the health sciences grows, and our populations age demographically, and live longer lives. Neither approach seems sustainable in the long term.
More on this at a later date. Your opinion is welcomed.
Sunday, December 24, 2006
Saturday, December 23, 2006
The venerable and highly respected Orac over at Respectful Insolence was voted the best Medical/Health Issues Blog in the Weblog awards.
Orac is particularly known for examining the evidence basis of dubious medical/health claims, and for often drawing the ire of the rabidly vocal anti-vax minority.
The Medical Weblog awards run via Medgadget are currently accepting nominations and voting starts early in the new year.
Voting is limited to one vote per IP address.
Dr Dork is pleasantly surprised to have been nominated for the Literary Medical Weblog category, and extends his thanks to the nominator, wherever you are!
Dr Dork considers himself seriously outclassed but it is nice to appear on the nomination list, especially having only actively blogged for a third of the year.
Well worth perusing the various nominees for both of the above awards in all categories - a great diversity of health blogging is but a click away.
Friday, December 22, 2006
Dr Dork is irate.
This case from the UK is one of the most ridiculous examples of tort law he has ever seen.
The anaesthetist in question is penalised for providing the advice that quitting smoking would prolong this persons lifespan. This is true. This is an attempt to act in the patients best interest. This is trying to do good, when it is easier to say nothing - to the belligerent patient in comfortable denial, regarding the ramifications of their habits upon their health.
Perhaps if the baby in question were premature, it could sue its mother for smoking throughout the pregnancy?
*"The first thing we must do, is kill all the lawyers". Dick the Butcher; King Henry VI, Shakespeare.
Despite popular interpretation as the first derogatory lawyer joke, in the context of Henry VI it is rather complimentary. Perhaps.
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Sunday, December 17, 2006
It is also a time of year that is especially hard for many. It is often thought that rates of suicide, for example, peak. However, this is in actuality not the case.
There has been some suggestion that the temporary boosting of services at such times is perhaps a reason, at least in part. This makes some sense to Dr Dork.
People do reach out more to others, at this time of year. Which is a good thing. However, come the new year, these good intentions may be often forgotten. Which is sad.
Better transient compassion than none, you might say.
Dr Dork has been of late considering whether he should gift his nom de plume a first name. 'Ebeneezer' had been suggested by Cathy following Dr Dorks reluctant and rather dour response to the "Christmas Meme".
Dr Dork was not being facetious in his responses. Added to the fact that he is wrangling the black dog at present, he understands why many loathe the 'festive season'. For Northern Hemisphere readers, this is also the time when Seasonal Affective Disorder is rampant.
Dr Dork has a simple prescription for making it through this period - watch this movie. And go easy on the eggnog.
Friday, December 15, 2006
The nomination process is apparently now open and actual voting begins early next year.
Dr Dork already has his favourites for a few categories and is willing to consider any informal email bets, usually involving some form of public humiliation of the 'loser'.
Or is this just an Oz thing ?
Here are the winners from 2005
Thursday, December 14, 2006
1. Hot Chocolate or Egg Nog?
Eggnog. No-one drinks hot chocolate when it's 40 degrees Celcius.
2. Does Santa wrap presents or just sit them under the tree?
Santa places the coal directly into the stockings.
3. Colored lights on tree/house or white?
Coloured on the tree, when I have one. There are motion activated spotlights on the outside to deter small children. Just like Halloween.
4. Do you hang mistletoe?
Nope. Not sure if it grows in Oz even.
5. When do you put your decorations up?
Last-minute if at all.
6. What is your favorite holiday dish?
7. Favorite Holiday memory?
When a toddler, noticing my father jingling some bells behind his back whilst pointing at "Santa flying over the roof'. Dr Dork is a born cynic.
8. When and how did you learn the truth about Santa?
9. Do you open a gift on Christmas Eve?No.
10. How do you decorate your Christmas Tree?
Haphazardly, if at all.
11. Snow! Love it or Dread it?
Love it, but it's not too common in an Australian summer.
12. Can you ice skate?
Very badly but technically yes. I broke my coccyx in an ice-skating mishap as a teenager.
13. Do you remember your favorite gift?
14. What’s the most important thing?
Reinforcing the need for compassion, for helping/giving to others. And meringues.
15. What is your favorite Holiday Dessert?
See 6. And 14.
16. What is your favorite holiday tradition?
The backyard post-lunch cricket match with the extended family that has been continuing for decades.
17. What tops your tree?
Is not to be repeated in a PG rated blog.
18. Which do you prefer giving or receiving?
Giving, of course.
19. What is your favorite Christmas Song?
Little Drummer Boy, Charley Pride rendition.
20. Candy canes, Yuck or Yum?OK....but I tend to re-use them each year. So they get a little stale.
Dr Dork understands that he is now meant to 'tag' several others who may wish to participate. So will tag :
A fellow Antipodean Barbados Butterfly
A fellow anachronism #1 Dinosaur
A fellow traveller Shiny Happy Person
A fellow curmudgeon Dr John Crippen
And DB, for the stimulating debate that has been evolving in his blog on the topic of
"personal responsiblity". Even though our opinions appear irreconcilable.
PS- please don't feel obligated if tagged. Dr Dork is aware that this is almost encroaching on chain mail territory. You will not develop a suppurating pustulence throughout your nether regions by ignoring the meme.
Well, probably not.
Dr Dork has been acquainted with the Dog for more years than he would care to remember.
This year, the Dog has been rather troublesome.
Rather troublesome indeed.
The reacquaintance, at close range, with this rabid rotty has had more than a little to do with the absence of the Dork in recent months.
It’s been years since the Dog misbehaved like this..
No tugging on the leash.
No chewing the couch.
No howling at the moon.
No mauling Dr Dork.
Though the Dog is a faithful companion, in his way, and has his own lessons to teach, he is not welcome company.
Breathe. Keep Breathing.
Don't lose your nerve.
Radiohead - Exit Music
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
Monday, December 11, 2006
This gives a nice précis of the problem.
The AMA has been calling recently for either a ban on their use as a surreptitious additive (they currently sneak through a food labelling loophole, it seems), or at the very least for labelling requirements…so that people are at the least aware of the trans-fat content.
In some parts of
Dr Wes, a cardiologist in Illinois has blogged recently on the topic following a ban on trans fats being enacted in New York, and is one of many voices noting that substitution with saturated fats will often occur, which isn’t really an improvement.
Dr Dork is a bit ambivalent about banning such things outright. He thinks the biggest issue at stake is the lack of disclosure – the situation whereby manufacturers have not had to disclose often inordinate levels of trans-fats until now.
Ischaemic heart disease is our biggest killer, after all.
At the very least, we deserve to know what we are eating.
Saturday, December 9, 2006
Dr Dork has been following with interest some posting earlier in the week by DB over at medrants, here and here...and here. More recently, #1 Dinosaur has thrown in his two cents with a thoughtful post on the topic.
Some interesting discourse has ensued in the comments section of DB's postings.
Essentially this is a discussion on the concept of a "reward" system for demonstrating personal responsibility in healthcare. The debate was sparked by this story.
As far as Dr Dork can tell, there appears to be considerable support in the US for such an approach in terms of health economics.
"Cost effective distribution of finite resources"
"Helping those who help themselves"
And so forth.
Dr Dork finds such a proposal....disturbing. This is not a question of economic principles.
If we reward only those able to comply with recommended treatment and lifestyle regimens, we are in effect punishing those unwilling or unable to comply.
As Dr Dork commented on the original debate on DB's medrants:
"In otherwords…punish those who do not, or are not able to, comply with recommended medical treatment ?
What of the doctor or business executive who develops a stress related cardiovascular problem and refuses to reduce their working hours ? Should they be refused treatment ? What if someone is non-compliant because they are unable to afford the medication ? What of the impoverished who are only able to afford junk food to eat rather than a broad healthy diet ?
In terms of personal responsibility, what if you cause a car accident(eg from fatigue, inattention) and suffer serious injuries - should your insurance be entitled to refuse you treatment?
Where do you draw the line ?
By this line of reasoning, are the homeless and poor in dire straits purely due to laziness ??
Are not mental health disorders, including alcohol and drug addictions, by their very nature characterised by poor insight and hence difficulties with compliance ?
Wolves may cull the weak from the pack…but we are human beings."
Such an approach raises profound philosophical, political and moral questions. It also reeks of countertransference towards "difficult patients".
This was brought to mind by one of Dr Dorks recent patients, Stan. Though seen by Dr Dork for another matter, Stan has been plagued by severe hypertension for years.
Stan is in his late 50s. He works a physical job. Long hours. Work is a bit sporadic, and Stan walks a financial tightrope. He takes several medications, for his blood pressure amongst other things. Some of these are not cheap.
Stan earns just above the low-income pharmaceutical concession threshold. Not by much. With all his health problems...he could probably go on disability if he wanted to. This would greatly lower his medical costs, and he would probably be fiscally better off. His medical costs are, almost entirely, his medication costs.
Stan is bulk-billed by his GP and specialists all. He is not charged anything out of pocket to see Dr Dork.
This week, Stan was waiting for a new job to start. He had to choose between paying his mortgage, and buying his blood pressure medications.
He chose the former.
Whilst not as astronomical as before treatment began, Stan's blood pressure was again high. Quite high, really. Not good. He already has a dodgy ticker.
Should Stan be refused followup and treatment from his cardiologist as he is a 'noncompliant' patient ?
Dr Dork doesn't think so.
Friday, December 8, 2006
For Dr Dork, Dr Flea is a favourite regular read.
Flea is a US paediatrician with an entertaining, sagacious style of writing, who is clearly driven first and foremost by the needs of his diminutive patients.
Flea has been nominated as a finalist in the 2006 Weblog awards in the Medical/Health category.
Dr Dork is wearing his shortest skirt and waving his pompoms exuberantly.
Sorry about the mental image.
Update: Dr Dork acknowledges that there are many other superlative bloggers in the same category, and intends no disrespect...but Dr Dork definitely has a soft spot for the Flea. Looks like the venerable quackbuster and woo-whomper Orac is lapping the field though.
In considering the state of the Australian health system, it is probably useful to be able to compare it to those of other countries.
Dr Dork, however, has firsthand experience of only a few different Australian states, and a relatively brief period of working in the
“the concept of a decent standard of health care for all, independent of means.”
Dr Dork comes from a similar perspective. He believes access to quality, timely, comprehensive healthcare is a fundamental right of all Australian citizens. Like the right to speak freely, to dress as one chooses (within reason), to hold a protest march, to worship one’s chosen deity, to vote as one pleases to.
Not a privilege for those who can afford it. We’re not talking about caviar. Life, and death, are often at stake.
As far as Dr Dork can tell, the
No system attempting to manage such a vast, unpredictable yawning abyss of expenditure can be perfect. Where much of the disdain is directed, it seems, is the gross inefficiency of current systems. The administrative bungling of the NHS and Oz’s public hospitals. The obscene corporate profits of the private
So every single time there is another health crisis - and various aspects of the system are often overloaded, some constantly - the same dance occurs. The States blame the Federal government. The Federal blames the States. Nothing gets done. The media moves on to dead donkeys. Australia has been, at the Federal level, under the sway of the conservative, right-wing Liberal party for a decade. For US readers, we find the name ironic as well. At the State level however, the Labor party runs the show. They are relatively left-wing, and historically Labor draws its power from the unions, the Libs from business and corporate interests. There are also the Greens and the Democrats, but neither has come close to holding the balance of power.
Australia has been, at the Federal level, under the sway of the conservative, right-wing Liberal party for a decade. For US readers, we find the name ironic as well. At the State level however, the Labor party runs the show. They are relatively left-wing, and historically Labor draws its power from the unions, the Libs from business and corporate interests. There are also the Greens and the Democrats, but neither has come close to holding the balance of power.
This is not a topic that is lightly broached. Dr Dork is very interested in hearing the perspectives of those who have experienced multiple disparate healthcare systems, as doctor, nurse, allied health staff and, especially, as patient.
Dr Dork is just laying some groundwork today.
To be continued.
Thursday, December 7, 2006
However, one skill he recalls well from his time as a psychiatry registrar is that of the mask. The façade.
This is a necessary thing, at times, in all of medicine. Particularly psychiatry.
A fundamental ethos of medical practice is the necessity to maintain an emotional distance from ones patients. The principal reason is to enable objective judgements to be made, without emotional bias. This protects patients.
Doctors in Oz are discouraged from treating family or close friends, for example. Our emotional attachments result in us usually either undertreating or overtreating. Both of which can be harmful.
Primum non nocere, after all.
A doctor allowing their emotional reaction to a patient to compromise their decision making is perhaps an example of countertransference. A good doctor provides the optimal care to each and every patient, be they saint or sociopath.
But doctors are subject to emotional reactions just like everyone else. Some of us get very desensitised, unfortunately, as a protective defence.
The key, at least to Dr Dorks mind, is not allowing our emotional reactions to affect our decision making. And, obviously, to not express our emotional reactions. Whatever they may be.
To maintain the facade. Protecting the doctor, perhaps, but principally protecting the patient.
Yet we still feel. We feel the lonely, lingering, untimely death that we cannot prevent. We flinch internally at the barrage of expletives. We seethe inside at the dozen old fracture lines on the malnourished childs Xray. Our pulse skips a beat at your drunken threat to our family.
We all learn to wear a mask.
Sometimes it’s hard to take it off.
Wednesday, December 6, 2006
are now up at
My, how this phenomenon is growing. Exponentially, it almost seems.
Dr Dork will need to pack a cut lunch and a thermos of tea to get through all these...but nonetheless anticipates reacquaintance and new discoveries both.
Tuesday, December 5, 2006
Hence the decision to recommend his readers put an email address into the NotifyList thingamajig.
To use the technical parlance.Unfortunately, notifylist continues to…well…not notify people on the list.
This was a problem prior to Dr Dorks sojourn and is rather irksome.
Thus the decision to terminate NotifyList.
All email addresses registered with the notifylist function have been sold to the Russian spamming mafia, for a tidy sum.
Just kidding. All have been destroyed.
Dr Dork has been noticing many seem to be using RSS and similar notification systems. Seems like a good idea. Any recommendations?
Bearing in mind that Dr Dork is not especially au fait with all these electrickery doohickies and whatnot.
Dr Dork would like to mention the cricket, but is averse to being flamed by his erudite British colleagues. So he won’t.
Dr Dork is pleased to confirm that the rumours of his demise are greatly exaggerated.
Each and every expression of concern is met with gratitude.
Dr Dork also notes that his unofficial hiatus far exceeded his official hiatus. Typically dorkish behaviour. Or perhaps doltish.
Dr Dork has been recently acclimatizing to the changes in the health blogosphere during his 7 month absence.
The cockles of his heart have been warmed by sentiments sweet, and by virtue of not being forgotten…despite his absence exceeding his presence.
Dr Dork is pleased to see many of his favourites still kicking against the...well, you know what.
Enamoured with the many new voices.
Time to update the blogroll.
Let us, then, be up and doing,
With a heart for any fate;
Still achieving, still pursuing,
Learn to labor and to wait.
Monday, November 13, 2006
He has not been well.
Apologies for not being able to reply to all comments and emails.
This blog is officially, now, in hiatus.
Dr Dork hopes to return to blogging in the future, particularly regarding the perspective of a doctor struggling with chronic health issues. Acute on Chronic of late, albeit.
Please join the notifylist if you would like to be informed if and when Dr Dork returns to the fray.
Warm regards to all fellow healthcare bloggers and all readers.
Dr Dork, signing off for now.
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
Tuesday, April 11, 2006
Dr Dork has been getting a bit "touchy-feely" in his last post and comments.
Dr Dork would like to reiterate that he is still definitely a grumpy old bastard. 'Nuff said.
Dr Dork spent some time working as a junior doctor on cardiology wards and in Coronary Care Units. And in emergency departments. He finds this area of medicine a bit of a mystery still at times. The difficulty is not in diagnosing an acute cardiac event...rather in working out what the hell is going on if cardiac enzymes, ECGs et cetera are normal.
Even though it is not his area, his clinic is not particularly close to an emergency hospital, so Dr Dork not infrequently gets a patient presenting with chest pain as he is "the nearest doc" to quite a few.
Dr Dork knows all the protocols for managing the serious side of things; arrests, anaphylaxis and the like. These kind of things are drummed into us ad nauseaum, no matter what area we practice in. Even back when he was doing psychiatry, Dr Dork had to do "resuscitation training" every 6 months.
A growing problem is how the management has been affected by the increasingly litigious climate here in Oz. It is the most common reason general practitioners in Oz are sued. So, in response, pretty much every single patient with chest pain presenting anywhere except to a cardiologists practice is now referred immediately to hospital. With the attendant expense to both the patient and the beleaguered public hospitals.
Unless they just put on a new shirt without taking the pins out. Even then it's touch and go.
Nonetheless, as a patient...it is a frightening position to be in. Simply being male increases risk. As does the work of Chronos. Heart disease is the biggest killer in Western society, after all. Of both genders.
Dr Dork would like to share some of his experiences as a cardiology patient, that he was not quite so aware of when on the other side of the desk.
1. It is impossible to sleep when you are wearing an ambulatory blood pressure monitor. This is a machine that involves an inflatable cuff being worn around your upper arm, wired up to a small device worn at your waist. It inflates to a level sufficient to cut off arterial circulation in your arm. Every single hour. For at least 24 hours.
If your partner grabbed your upper arm and squeezed as hard as they could every single hour during the night, Dr Dork suspects this might qualify as grounds for justifiable homicide.
2. If you have symptoms of a cardiac arrhythmia and wear a 24 hour ECG (Holter) monitor, you are guaranteed to experience symptoms immediately before the monitor is connected...and soon after it is disconnected.
3.Fixomull is rather painful indeed when removed from the chest in large quantity. Especially if the patient is worried the ECG Holter Monitor leads it has been used to affix are a bit loose. And the patient then adds significantly larger quantities of Fixomull than had the ECG technician. Covering a nipple.
Dr Dork understands how Steve Carell felt.
Saturday, April 8, 2006
Or the net. Or whatever the kids call it nowadays.
Many thanks to all well-wishers. Apologies for such a long absence. Dr Dork has been crook, to use the Oz vernacular.
Dr Dork considers himself still relatively young. His hair follicles might beg to differ.
Nonetheless, there has been a fair amount of illness in his life, especially in the last 5 years.
Some cardiological things. Some gastrointestinal things.
But most of all, the Black Dog
Some readers will have inferred this already, perhaps, from some of Dr Dorks previous posts.
This will be elaborated upon later. As an ongoing theme. In much detail. You have been warned.
Dr Dork has spent many hours, whilst squirming uncomfortably in the patient role, pondering the reasons he began a blog in the first place. He thinks there are a few.
1. Dr Dork is opinionated.
He holds the view that the world should be a more just and fair place than it currently is. According to Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) principles, he now understands that this is classified as the "fallacy of fairness". Whilst Dr Dork accepts every other cognitive distortion that Ellis et al propose, he's stuck on this one. Blogging alleviates a sense of injustice. Like any half decent medico, Dr Dork gets pissed off at things that impact negatively upon the health of the society in which he lives, and on his own patients.
Ventilation, in a nutshell.
Dr Dork knows that a lot of patients seek information over the internet. This can be beneficial, or can be dangerous. As a general principle, Dr Dork thinks it is fantastic when patients take responsibility for their illness and want to be well informed. It bodes well for outcomes. But there is a lot of biased misinformation out there. Dr Dork believes that medicine is art as well as science. But the art is in the communication and interaction with a great diversity of individuals, and in the finer, subtle aspects of diagnosis and care. The provision of treatment is essentially based on scientific principles. Dr Dork may be a squeaky little voice in the forest, but that won't stop him squeaking. This is better explained here.
3. Doctor as Patient.
The world as viewed by someone struggling with depression. Who has straddled both sides of the fence.
Dr Dork suspects this is, perhaps, the principle reason that drove him to blog, in light of the problems in the treatment and prevention of psychiatric/psychological illness in Oz.
Which become more evident when you've seen them from multiple perspectives.
This is also the reason he has been careful about anonymity and location, and shies away from discussing his own practice. Sadly, even amongst the medical profession, depression and other psychiatric illnesses remain highly stigmatised.
Dr Dork has previously spent several years working as a psychiatry registrar. He went about halfway down the path to becoming a fully fledged psychiatrist before realising that he was sublimating his own illness, and changed to a different area of medicine.
However, Dr Dork has learnt more about mental health issues as a patient and a carer for a family member than he ever did as a doctor treating psychiatric illness.
He has learnt more about medicine than in all his years of study and clinical practice.
In otherwords, the experience of Doctor as Patient...with a chronic, common, complex illness, with much morbidity, significant mortality, and no ready cure.
Dr Dorks own illness is a mix of biological and psychological factors. He has experiencd both aspects of depression as a consumer, a carer, and a curer.
Dr Dork will return to this topic soon.
Grand rounds will be up on Monday at Anxiety, Addiction and Depression Treatments.
Dr Dork is recuperating with relatives whom are computer bereft and apologises, in that he might take a few days between posts, and a few days to reply to comments or emails. Akin to Intueri and Dr Crippen, both of whom are highly recommended, Dr Dork attempts to respond to all comments. If you've taken the time to read Dr Dorks blathering opinions, your own justly deserves a response.
Monday, February 20, 2006
Dr Dork has unfortunately not been well, and after various scans and whatnot tomorrow is chuffing off to hospital for probably some weeks.
Dr Dork is not au fait with bluetooth and wireless laptops and PDAs, so won't be able to post until he eventually gets back to his crusty old PC.
Dr Dork sends his regards to his readers. All three of you.
Saturday, February 18, 2006
In essence, it is a strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, the biggest killer in Western society. Specifically, it aimed to reduce several risk factors clearly associated with cardiovascular disease, such as blood pressure, cholesterol, and clotting propensity. It provided some evidence that if everyone over 55 or with a history of cardiovascular disease starting popping this combination pill, the incidence of heart attacks and strokes would drop by 80-90%.
There has been considerable debate about this. Some question the methodology and statistical leaps of faith of the researchers. Some question cost effectiveness. A Dr Trewby, a Darlington physician, took the trouble to review the statistical claims in detail. He points out that, "if a typical 55 year old took the Polypill for the next 10 years the chance of benefit will be less than 1% per year and that of side effects 6% overall, some of which (such as aspirin related gastro-intestinal haemorrhage) may be life threating".
"There are three types of lies - lies, damn lies, and statistics." (Mark Twain)
A rather whimsical response to the Polypill proposition was published in the BMJ a year or so later: the Polymeal. By careful wording of statistical results adopting this particular dietary approach suggested a 76% reduction in cardiovascular events.
Ingredients of most benefit were red wine (1/2 a glass a day), fish four times per week, lots of fruit and vegetables, of course, almonds, garlic, and...100 grams per day of dark chocolate. The last one got a lot of lay press attention, that's for sure. Most didn't realise the whole exercise was a bit tongue in cheek, and the evidence tenuous.
Still...my dinner plans for tonight are garlic bread followed by a fish meal, accompanied by red wine, with a chocolate dessert.
Thursday, February 16, 2006
This is an ethical minefield.
Dr Dork is not an obstetrician. He is also not a woman.
He is not an expert on exactly what point a termination remains permissible. He doesn't agree with this, though.
There is an interesting medicopolitical debate raging in Australia at present.
It is about RU486.
RU486, or Mifepristone, is principally an antiprogesterone. A type of hormone. It is fundamentally used as a medical, as opposed to surgical, method of inducing first trimester abortion, and also as an alternative to postcoital contraception.
Post-coital contraception, also known as "the morning after pill" (Postinor-2), can be purchased over the counter from pharmacists in Australia. Dr Dork thinks this is a problem. For one thing, those engaging in unsafe sexual behaviour are at risk of various STDs. Including HIV. This warrants professional counselling and education of the risks involved, so that people can make informed choices.
A chemist, on a shop floor, is neither qualified to do this, nor in a situation to do this with any modicum of privacy.
Abortion law is very complicated in Australia. It varies greatly from state to state. In some states, 1st trimester abortion is permissible only if there is endangerment of the physical or mental health of the prospective mother. In other states, it is permissible if there is "social or family risk", with the proviso that "counselling" of some form is given in regards to risks of abortion, and the risks of continuing pregnancy.
It is all very confusing. To cut through all the 'bull'...women in Australia have been able to obtain surgical abortions, if they so desire, quite easily, for decades. It is not for Dr Dork to pass judgement on this.
The issue of late has been regarding an alternative method for an already accepted procedure in Australian society. Some women, if they decide to abort a pregancy early, are at less risk of harm if they choose RU486 over surgical abortion.
There is little evidence which option is generally better, from recent reviews of the research evidence, here and here.
The issue has become more than a matter of science. Generally, matters in regards to approval of medications for use in Australia are decided by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, or TGA. The TGA serves as a risk management review authority of any medication or medical device. It is staffed by scientists, epidemiologists, and other experts in the relevant fields.
The problem with RU486 is that, in 1996, legislation was introduced by our current highly conservative government, still in power, enabling the health minister to veto the TGA on certain matters. Such as RU486. Our health minister,Tony Abbott, is a lawyer with a previous background in economics. He has no training or experience in any scientific discipline whatsoever, let alone health matters.
He is also a staunch Catholic.
A private Members bill to return the decision making process on medical abortion to the TGA is in the process of passing through the various stages of approval in the Australian parliament, and appears likely to succeed. It has become what we refer to as a conscience vote. Even from Mr Abbotts own party, the majority of female politicians have voted in favour of removing his veto.
Dr Dork doesn't like politicians deciding national matters on the basis of their religion. This is a very dangerous and slippery slope to tread.
Church and State should remain separate. Theocracy is a form of dictatorship.
Note: Dr Dork apologies to his NotifyList members...the service seems to be misbehaving.
Tuesday, February 14, 2006
Maria, the author of intueri, is an American psychiatry resident who has blogged through much of her medical training.
Although young, she is thus one of the medical blogospheres more venerable figures.
Intueri mixes personal musings with compassionate and literary tales of psychiatry.
Monday, February 13, 2006
Terry Vo was 10 years old.
Terry attempted a "slam dunk" on a backyard basketball ring.
It went horribly wrong.
The backboard, basketball ring, and wall, collapsed, landing on Terry. He had one foot severed midcalf, and both arms completely severed below the elbows.
Thanks to heroic efforts by the surgical team that night, all three limbs were reattached.
Eventually, the reattached foot did not take, and is now prosthetic. But Terry still has both arms, and is apparently progressing well in rehabilitation.
This is the real heroism. This courageous young mans positive outlook has never faltered. He has progressed beyond medical expectation.
He was back at school by September. He wants to be a doctor when he grows up.
He is now advocating child safety on behalf of the WA police service.
That is Dr Dorks kind of hero.